Gambaran Penilaian Derajat Ulkus Diabetikum Menggunakan Klasifikasi Meggitt–Wagner dan SINBAD
Overview of Diabetic Ulcer Severity Assessment Using the Meggitt–Wagner and SINBAD Classifications
Keywords:
Diagnostic accuracy, Diabetic foot ulcer, Meggitt–Wagner, SINBAD, Wound classificationAbstract
Assessing the severity of diabetic ulcers is crucial for determining clinical management and patient prognosis. This quantitative, cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate ulcer severity profiles using the Meggitt–Wagner and SINBAD classifications in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. A total of 190 respondents were selected via purposive sampling, with a majority being male (50.5%) and working as housewives (51.1%). According to the Meggitt–Wagner classification, most respondents fell into the severe (47.4%) and moderate (43.7%) categories. Meanwhile, the SINBAD instrument classified patients predominantly into high (45.8%) and moderate (40.5%) categories. These findings indicate discrepancies in wound mapping distribution; Meggitt–Wagner emphasizes macro-anatomical aspects (wound depth and infection/gangrene), whereas SINBAD offers a more comprehensive evaluation by integrating broader physiological factors such as ischemia and neuropathy. In conclusion, the majority of patients presented with complex wound conditions requiring multidimensional management.
References
American Diabetes Association. (2021). Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care, 44(Suppl 1), S15–S33. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S002
Armstrong, D. G., Boulton, A. J. M., & Bus, S. A. (2017). Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376(24), 2367–2375. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1615439
Bus, S. A., Armstrong, D. G., Gooday, C., Jarl, G., Caravaggi, C., Viswanathan, V., & Lazzarini, P. A. (2020). Guidance on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 36(S1), e3274. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3274
Camilleri, A., Gatt, A., & Formosa, C. (2020). Inter-rater reliability of four validated diabetic foot ulcer classification systems. Journal of Tissue Viability, 29(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2020.04.004
Faridah, A. (2023). Peran perawat dalam perawatan luka kronis berbasis budaya. Jurnal Keperawatan Berbudaya Sehat (JKBS), 1(1), 10–18.
Hikmah, N., & Hariati, N. W. (2023). Hubungan persepsi, aktivitas fisik, pola makan, dan indeks massa tubuh (IMT) dengan kejadian diabetes melitus tipe 2. Jurnal Riset Pangan dan Gizi, 5(2), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.31964/jr-panzi.v5i2.187
Hingorani, A., LaMuraglia, G. M., Henke, P., Meissner, M. H., Loretz, L., Zinszer, K., ... & Murad, M. H. (2016). The management of diabetic foot. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 63(2), 3S–21S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.011
Ince, P., Kendrick, D., Game, F., & Jeffcoate, W. (2008). The SINBAD classification system. Diabetes Care, 31(5), 964–967. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-2391
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Infodatin: Tetap produktif, cegah dan atasi diabetes melitus. Kemenkes RI.
Lavery, L. A., Armstrong, D. G., & Peters, E. J. (2019). Risk factors for diabetic foot complications. Diabetes Care, 42(2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1348
