Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna terhadap Antarmuka E-Commerce Tokopedia Menggunakan Metode Performance-Importance Analysis

Authors

  • Kairos Abraham Sumigar universitas sam ratulangi
  • ivan jason legi universitas sam ratulangi
  • ade yusupa S.Pd, M.Kom universitas sam ratulangi

Abstract

Pertumbuhan industri e-commerce di Indonesia yang pesat menghadirkan persaingan yang semakin intensif di antara platform marketplace digital, sehingga kepuasan pengguna terhadap antarmuka menjadi faktor penentu utama keberlangsungan dan daya saing platform. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kepuasan pengguna terhadap antarmuka e-commerce Tokopedia menggunakan metode Performance-Importance Analysis (PIA). Sebanyak 15 atribut antarmuka dievaluasi, meliputi kemudahan navigasi, kecepatan loading, kelengkapan informasi produk, kemudahan pembayaran, kualitas tampilan visual, fitur pencarian, keamanan transaksi, pendaftaran akun, ulasan produk, notifikasi pesanan, filter produk, responsivitas mobile, perbandingan produk, customer service chat, serta proses retur dan refund. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner terstruktur yang didistribusikan kepada 120 pengguna aktif Tokopedia melalui purposive sampling. Analisis memetakan setiap atribut ke dalam empat kuadran Importance-Performance Matrix berdasarkan nilai rata-rata kepentingan (4,32) dan kinerja (3,77) sebagai garis batas. Hasil menunjukkan tujuh atribut berada di Kuadran I (Concentrate Here) yang memerlukan perbaikan segera, lima atribut di Kuadran II (Keep Up the Good Work), dua atribut di Kuadran III (Low Priority), dan satu atribut di Kuadran IV (Possible Overkill). Temuan ini memberikan rekomendasi strategis berbasis data bagi tim pengembang Tokopedia untuk memprioritaskan perbaikan antarmuka sesuai ekspektasi pengguna.

References

Abalo, J., Varela, J., & Manzano, V. (2007). Importance values for Importance–Performance Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 60(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.009

Agarwal, R., & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Assessing a firm’s web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.168.84

Asosiasi E-Commerce Indonesia (idEA). (2023). Laporan E-Commerce Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: idEA.

Bilgihan, M. A., & Bujisic, M. (2015). The effect of website features in online relationship marketing: A case of online hotel booking. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(4), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2014.09.001

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry (pp. 189–194). London: Taylor & Francis.

Cyr, D., Head, M., & Larios, H. (2010). Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: A multi-method evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(1–2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.005

Dachyar, R., & Banjarnahor, L. (2018). Factors influencing user satisfaction of e-commerce websites in Indonesia. MATEC Web of Conferences, 164, 01027. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816401027

DataReportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Indonesia. DataReportal. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com

Fernandez, S., Ares, J., & García-Berdones, J. (2019). Evaluating web accessibility of e-commerce sites: A performance-importance approach. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(3), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0632-5

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Hampshire: Cengage Learning.

ISO 9241-11. (2018). Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

Kim, J., Jin, B., & Swinney, J. L. (2009). The role of etail quality, e-satisfaction and e-trust in online loyalty development process. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(4), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2008.11.019

Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112

Maulana, A., Aknuranda, I., & Rokhmawati, N. (2020). Evaluasi antarmuka aplikasi Tokopedia menggunakan metode heuristic evaluation. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 4(8), 2631–2640.

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Olson, D. L., & Wu, D. D. (2017). Simulation of importance-performance analysis. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(4), 734–754. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-05-2016-0088

Santoso, H. B., & Schrepp, M. (2020). The impact of cultural background and usability of different user interface designs on the UX of an e-commerce website. Heliyon, 6(12), e05729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05729

Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J. (2017). Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 4(6), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

Statista. (2024). E-commerce in Indonesia: Statistics and facts. Statista Research Department. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com

Downloads

Published

2026-10-29