ETHICAL DILEMMA OF OFFENSIVE MAGIC IN HARRY POTTER AND THE DEADLY HOLLOWS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35473/pho.v8i1.3810Keywords:
Ethical Dilemma, Deontology, Offensive Magic, Utilitarianism, Wizarding WorldAbstract
In Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, the employment of unforgivable curses and other offensive magic creates ethical dilemma in the context of combat and self-defense. This shows that there is a tension between ideal ethical principles and real needs in self-defense efforts which also often occurs in the real world where considerations often experience a dilemma between punishment and human rights. This study seeks to examine the moral judgment regarding the use of magic from the perspectives of Deontology and Utilitarianism, as well as its impact on the moral decisions of the main characters. This study employs qualitative methodologies and a textual analysis methodology to examine the theories of Deontology, which examines morality based on universal obligations and principles, and Utilitarianism, which assesses morality based on the impact and benefits for a large number of people. According to the findings, the Deontological perspective views Harry, Molly Weasley, Hermione, and Snape's usage of unforgivable curses and offensive magic as a moral deviance, regardless of the good intentions or advantages. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, defends these behaviors since they benefit the greater number of people. This ethical quandary highlights the conflict between the moral need to not injure others and the need to defend oneself in battle situations.
References
Alderete-Diez, P. (2019). Death and how to deal with it in the Harry Potter series. In Cultural Politics in Harry Potter (pp. 147-162). Routledge.
Ambarini, A. S., Harjito, I. K. I. P., & Umaya, N. M. (2010). Pelatihan Kajian Analisis Sastra Membangun Keterampilan Diri dengan Kemampuan Menganalisis Imajinasi Sastra Bagi Mahasiswa IKIP PGRI Semarang. E-Dimas: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 1(2), 80-92: 2528-5041,
Ann Tlusty, B. (2019). Bravado, martial magic, and masculine performance in early modern Germany. Daphnis, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004401921_003
Archer, D. (2015). Harry Potter and Control : An Inherent Power Narrative in the Wizarding World. Conversations, 2(1).
Aristo, T. J. V., & Sijono, S. (2019). The Characteristics Of Albus Dumbledore In Harry Potter And Deathly Hollow By Jk. Rowling. JEES: Journal of English Educational Study, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v1i2.327
Arneson, R. (2018). Deontology’s Travails. In Moral Puzzles and Legal Perplexities: Essays on the Influence of Larry Alexander. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108227025.021
Asal, V., & Schulzke, M. (2012). A Shot Not Taken: Teaching About the Ethics of Political Violence. International Studies Perspectives, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00487.x
Augé, C. R. (2020). The Hoodoo that You Do: The Material Culture of Gendered Magic as Risk Management Mechanisms. In Live Evil: Of Magic and Men. https://doi.org/10.1163/9781848880726_016
Camelia, M., Suastini, N. W., & Ayomi, P. N. (2023). Illocutionary Acts on Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Movie. Journal of Language and Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 204-212. https://doi.org/10.22334/traverse.v4i2.227
Caron, J. F. (2023). The Moral Dilemmas of Fighting Terrorism and Guerrilla Groups. In The Moral Dilemmas of Fighting Terrorism and Guerrilla Groups. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110757569
Clark, I. (2017). Taking ‘justness’ seriously in just war: who are the ‘miserable comforters’ now? International Affairs, 93(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix003
Coy, C. (2025). The Last Enemy: Reading Harry Potter as an Extended Grief Narrative. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.1353/chq.2023.a921311
Dendle, P. (2008). Monsters, Creatures, and Pets at Hogwarts Animal Stewardship in the World of Harry Potter. In Critical Perspectives on Harry Potter: 2nd edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892817-16
Dunne, J. A. (2023). Harry Potter and the Aims of Transhumanism: A Magical Critique of Technological Immortality. Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.3138/jrpc.2021-0048
Gardner, D., & Macky, K. (2012). Generational differences: Something old, something new. In Work and Quality of Life: Ethical Practices in Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4059-4_22
Harari, Y. (2017). Three Charms for Killing Adolf Hitler. Aries, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1163/15700593-01702002
Hennequin, M. W. (2013). Harry Potter and the legends of saints. Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.3138/jrpc.25.1.67
JA, D. F., & Rodríguez-Peña, F. M. (2019). Proposal of a deontological framework for spanish biologists. Cuadernos de Bioetica: Revista Oficial de la Asociacion Espanola de Bioetica y Etica Medica, 30(100), 277-287.
Kearns, A. J. (2017). A duty-based approach for nursing ethics & practice. In Key Concepts and Issues in Nursing Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49250-6_2
Kusev, P., van Schaik, P., Alzahrani, S., Lonigro, S., & Purser, H. (2016). Judging the morality of utilitarian actions: How poor utilitarian accessibility makes judges irrational. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1029-2
Los, F. (2008). Harry potter and the nature of death. Alternatives Journal, 34(1).
Mackenzie, A. (2019). “A Story About how Humans are Frightened of Death”: Harry Potter, Death and the Cultural Imagination. In Cultural Politics in Harry Potter (pp. 87-97). Routledge.
Metla, S., & Devi, Y. V. S. (2024). Meaningful miracles: Unraveling eucatastrophe in the select fantasy fiction of JK Rowling. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 29(4), 673-684. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2024-29-4-673-684
Müller, W. G. (2016). A journey through the realms of good and evil: Ethics in philosophy and literature. In Forum for World Literature Studies (Vol. 8, Issue 1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iftinan Rose Putri Safana -
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
